Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Lab vs. home processing.
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:31 2004
References: <c3148fc3274b.c3274bc3148f@shaw.ca> <1080070330.27473.50.camel@creo_pc3> <40610A1E.9080900@cox.net> <1080150969.23270.28.camel@creo_pc3> <4061DE93.1060504@osheaven.net> <1080156438.23270.50.camel@creo_pc3> <4061E960.1000100@osheaven.net>
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:02, Sam wrote:
> Yes. It acts very much like D-76. In fact, my times for D-23 are the
> published times for D-76. It's a famous older developer that is renowned
> for its ability to hold highlights.
>
> If you would like to try it, this is the original formula:
>
> Water (125 degrees, 50 Cel.) 24 oz. / 750 cc.
> Metol 1/4 oz. / 7.5 grams
> Sodium Sulfite 3 oz. / 100 grams
> Cold water to make 32 ozs. / 1 liter
> Dissolve chemicals in order given above (If you add the Sodium Sulfite
> first it will difficult if not impossible to get a solution)
> Use D-76 developing times to start.
>
> Sam S
Thanks. I read a big article about D23 over at the unblinkingeye.com
Looks like you are using a A and B solution.
feli
Replies:
Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Reply from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
In reply to:
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from durling at cox.net (Mike Durling) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)