Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]hey bob, thanks, that helps a lot -- i was beginning to wonder if i had something unheard of before, no web searches turned up anything on this, and the silence from the rest of the list was deafening... so it's an early part of the run, eh? It needs its focus cam adjusted -- camera won't go to infinity with it on, but after 60 years and a couple of good knocks, waddaya expect, eh? Took some test photos this morning and then got tired of hauling all that weight around, i swear it weighs as much as an m3 body. thanks again, charlie In a message dated 3/22/04 1:32:44 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: > Message: 29 > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:30:24 EST > From: Thinkofcole@aol.com > Subject: [Leica] Charlie Trentelman's 127mm 4.5 Anastigmat > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Message-ID: <1d9.1ced69fa.2d907cb0@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Jim Lager's Vol. II of his Illustrated History says on page 96 that > Wollensak > made the lens and Leica New York made the mount on the 127/4.5 Velostigmat > "as early as 1944'' He said the "very early'' ones were not coated and were > engraved "Leica > Anastigmat. Later ones, he said, were coated and were engraved Velostigmat > or > Raptar. He shows a pix of a 127mm/4.5 "Leica Anastigmat" engraved Leica New > York made in USA #439060, very close to Trentelman's lens number. -- bob > cole > [my first attempt at posting.] > >