Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 1:43 PM -0800 3/19/04, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>On 3/17/04 8:40 PM, "GREG LORENZO" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>> I asked about the original Xpan some time ago on the Lug and
>>received a number
>> of responses suggesting among other things that the finish on this
>> equipment
>> (cameras and lenses) wore right before your eyes with just minimal
>> useage.
>>
>> Anyone have any thoughts, based upon experience with the Xpan II, as to
>> whether things had improved any? Any other thoughts also appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>I'd kill for one.
>Love them panoramics. Wish the format on this on was not quite so wide.
>This new camera looks twice as cool as the before.
>Seems like an ideal thing I've always wanted being able to change in the
>middle of the role expect the glass is ok but not something you'd want to
>bring home to meet mom.
>
>
>Mark Rabiner
>Photography
>Portland, Oregon
The glass is exceptional. Leica or Zeiss could be proud to have their
names on it.
Unfortunately, of course, the prices reflect that.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com