Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 1:43 PM -0800 3/19/04, Mark Rabiner wrote: >On 3/17/04 8:40 PM, "GREG LORENZO" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> I asked about the original Xpan some time ago on the Lug and >>received a number >> of responses suggesting among other things that the finish on this >> equipment >> (cameras and lenses) wore right before your eyes with just minimal >> useage. >> >> Anyone have any thoughts, based upon experience with the Xpan II, as to >> whether things had improved any? Any other thoughts also appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Greg >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > >I'd kill for one. >Love them panoramics. Wish the format on this on was not quite so wide. >This new camera looks twice as cool as the before. >Seems like an ideal thing I've always wanted being able to change in the >middle of the role expect the glass is ok but not something you'd want to >bring home to meet mom. > > >Mark Rabiner >Photography >Portland, Oregon The glass is exceptional. Leica or Zeiss could be proud to have their names on it. Unfortunately, of course, the prices reflect that. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com