Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:18 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <A5DEF66C-77D9-11D8-9214-000A95CD9BF8@mac.com> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca>
At 03:15 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>I say this with the greatest respect for the talents of the professional
>photographers here, if not their courage to be innovative.
>
>Sam S
I started with Minolta's because I couldn't afford Leica anything! I still
have my Maxxums and a lot of good lenses. The earliest color photos on my
web site were taken with Minolta's. If their digital is cheap enough, I'll
get it to make use of my Minolta lenses. I have a 200/2.8, an 80/1.4, and
16 fish-eye that are really nice.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
In reply to:
Message from leicaman at sympatico.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)