Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 3/16/04 2:53 PM, "F?lix L?pez de Maturana" <fmaturana@euskalnet.net> wrote: > >> I am scratching my head wondering, why would I get the D2 >> instead of the Digital Rebel? As much as I am NOT a fan of the hybrid >> 35mm / DSLR philosophy, the $999 Digital Rebel / 300D just seems to >> take better pictures at half the price. > > Quite true Marc, but mind that you will need a better zoom that the one > which comes with the Rebel and, then, price will be higher! And the > pictures > quality too. > > Felix > > -- Becuae it says "Canan Rebel" on it and looks like it was made in Willy Wonka's Chocolate factory. An embarrassment to be seen in public with. And it's a DSLR. Not a direct comparison to the D2 in which the lens does not come off putting it in the point and shoot category with the smaller sensors but are smaller cameras. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland, Oregon New Improved http://rabinergroup.com/ -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html