[Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples

[gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)]

B.D. writes in part:

> "So I really don't need Sean, or you, to explain what is totally obvious 
> from reading the review - the camera has some neat features, handles 
> beautifully, and produces noisy,oversharpened, images."

Now I think you really starting to get it. The reviews stand on their own, 
beautifully, and certainly don't need "unqualified 3rd parties" to interpret 
them. Most of them are quite clear on their conclusions! 
> 
> "As to my 'ranting and raving,' I hardly think any one who is in the
> least objective would read the paragraph you read as 'ranting and
> raving' as anything other than a simple statement of what I see the
> current Leica offering to be, and what I wish it was."

I stand corrected. Your constant, unending, negative, posts regarding all 
things Leica R, or Leica D, or Leica Pricing are not "rants and raves". They 
merely qualify as "rants".

On the other hand, your constant, continuous, repetitious, unending, posts, 
enthralling us all with the "wonders" of Olympus digital (over and over and 
over again) qualify as "rants and raves". I've been hoping over the months 
and years that you would number them for us. This would allow some of us 
slow on the uptake types to get your meaning much quicker.
> 
> "And as to your suggesting that "wait (quietly)" for someone to 
> build a digital M or build it myself...Well, when Brian finally gets tired 
> of
> running the LUG, and you take it over, you'll be much better 
> positionedto tell someone to "wait (quietly)." As much as I'd like 
> to tell you the same thing, I recognize that this is a wide-open list, and 
> even 
> you have a right to post whatever kind of nonsense you care to."

Here, is another example of how the proposed "Colen numbering system" could 
come in handy. You could number this paragraph right up there in your 
series, perhaps number 3 or 4 even! If I had a nickel for every time I read 
this inane nonsense from you I'd out rank Bill Gates on Fortunes annual 
People With Vaults Full of Too Money List. Some people, those who can; Do. 
Other people, those who can?t used to Teach. Now it seems some of them hang 
around User Groups to Pontificate and Troll!

I don't know if Brian still has an open offer to provide free enthusiasts 
lists like the LUG to all comers. If so, you could setup two of them. With 
one you could pontificate on the wonders of "Non-Leica" equipment, perhaps 
with a "Rant of the Day". The name "UNLUG" somehow seems appropriate! On a 
second List, called perhaps the "REALLYUNLUG" you could enthrall the 
subscribers with a "Rant & Rave of the Day" and flack Olympus products at 
the same time.
> 
> Best to you, too.
> 
> B. D.

and you,

Greg





--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html