Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Howdy gang, Here's a Leica Digilux 2 ASA "film ?" rating discovery. oh well OK, sensitivity surprise! :-) As many of you know on the Digilux 2 it's highest ASA is shown as 400. Well that's true. However, if you set it at 400 and set the EV button to 2 stops under exposed producing theoretically 1600, the camera along with PS after down loading the memory card to computer produces some quite acceptable images. I was quite impressed after shooting at an indoor CFL football game in the Vancouver Sky Dome stadium. Yep the image on the camera screen certainly appears under-exposed. But when you put it up on the computer screen and using PhotoShop with a few tweaks of levels and curves and by golly it comes back just like it looked in the stadium and prints out quite well. The whites are white and the face colours are quite acceptable. Noise? Well I didn't hear any from the camera. Oh you want to no about the "grain effect?" Forget it, it's basically non-existant certainly on 8.5 X 11 size prints. I suppose if one wanted to get niggilly and wanted to make a big fuss over it, you might see some "grain" in the turf areas and it was hard for me to accept it was there when my son pointed out... "Yeah it kind of looks like some "noise" effect on the turf." Well I wish 1600 film came out with the little amount of "grain" look as appeared from this manipulation of the Digilux 2's film sensitivity. So maybe there's hope for the Digilux 2 yet as an available light kind of camera after all, of course with a little help from PhotoShop! ;-) Now I'm intrigued to see where I can go with this in B&W! Will let you know after the weekend. ted