Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I bought a Nikkor 105/2.5 in, I think, 1970 and used it a lot for twenty years. There's no sense comparing the qualities of any thirty-five year old lens to a current production Leica lens. However, I recall that I felt the same emotional attachment to that lens as people seem to feel to the 35 Summilux Aspheric and the 90 AA, which is saying quite a lot. Buzz Hausner -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+buzz.hausner=verizon.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+buzz.hausner=verizon.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Feli di Giorgio Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:50 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Lenses without digital Bodies, Anyone? On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:04, B. D. Colen wrote: > Well it's a Nikon description, but the images suggest my memory hasn't > totally gone to hell.:-) Thanks, Feli - Well, here's what I have read elsewhere. The 105/2.5 is very, very good. Not as good as a 2.8/100 APO or 2.8/90 Elmarit, but it also costs a heck of a lot less. ;-) Feli