Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Don Dory wrote: > Daniel, > By Jove I think you have found a lens you like, the 21. I think you're right. I do! And I do appreciate your kind remarks. > Specific comments about this image: > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/35alt1.html > > I think that if you had leveled the lens so as to square up the lines it > would improve the image. You're referring to the lines (vertical lines) on the right, correct? I saw it when I scanned but didn't reflect much on it. > What I am getting to is possibly have you work > with shooting off hand from a lower point of view, say chest high to > retain the perspective but eliminate the converging lines. I see your point. I'll give it a try. I'll probably not drop the camera to my chest but just squat. I've noticed that if you want to use a 21, you have a lose a bit of shyness. As long as it's not secret that I'm taking pictures, I might as well do a quick half-squat (remember those? It was a form of punishment when I went to school ... "Over in the corner, 3 minutes." Then we'd have to hold a half-squat for three minutes). > Normally in > street work converging lines do not matter, but in this image there is a > sense of still life or surrealism that almost begs for a very squared up > image. I agree. It would have been stronger. I'm very pleased that you noticed the odd impression I was trying to convey. I wasn't sure if it wasn't just my warped sense of sight. I'm going to crop as you suggest. Funny that I didn't think of the square. I rather like them otherwise. Thanks again! Daniel