Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Ugly photos: Urban Nature
From: geebee at geebeephoto.com (GeeBee)
Date: Sun Aug 29 08:39:36 2004
References: <20040828180000.TOVF1580.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@straylight><001701c48d2a$7c4d4c80$39464254@desktop> <a3e3j05dk4mlupq1ktf7ah85gusbdibgfa@4ax.com>


>
>  http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Garden_sign.html
>
> Is this the one that inspired a group of people to argue over whether or
not
> the sign was real or photoshopped in, even after you told them it was
real?
>
> I remember seeing this before, and it still comes with a chuckle.  And a
> vague part of my memory says it's the "disputed" picture.  :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------

that's the one :-)



In reply to: Message from locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke) ([Leica] Re: Ugly photos: Urban Nature)
Message from geebee at geebeephoto.com (GeeBee) ([Leica] Re: Ugly photos: Urban Nature)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Ugly photos: Urban Nature)