Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] /studio lighting
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Fri Aug 27 00:57:56 2004
References: <7629EB4795F39146A4D2ECC655CD68EA01DBC1B4@asc02.asc.upenn.edu> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0408270848090.21249@hedvig.uio.no>

snip.
>
> STUDIO LIGHTING
>
> I'm struggling too. I haven't forked out yet. Every time I get ready to, I
> notice that there are weaker strobes marketed as good for digital (250W or
> 300W instead of 500 and above).
>
> Those with studio experience ... can you live with the lower power? Even
> if you wanted to use them for film too, could you use a higher ISO/ASA
> film instead of more powerful strobes?
>
> There seems to be a savings to be made there and some of the lower power
> strobes (Elinchrom for example) actually seem to be more or less right up
> there with the leaders of the pack with regard to other features.
>
> Daniel


I was most fortunate to do the lighting once for a professional shoot.
The first thing i noticed was that professional strobes are a lot easier to
work with.
High energy ratings give very nice light in large reflectors and boxes.
Much more pleasing shadows obviously they are easier to operate as well.
About a hundred euros will rent you a nice outfit for a day.
I would give it a try and see for yourself.
best regards
simon jessurun
amsterdam
p.s. ever seen these?
http://www.sinarbron.com/bron/umbrellas/para.php


Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] /studio lighting)
In reply to: Message from KCassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] Kyle posts provocative new work in a futile attempt to stop the i nnane riefenstahl nonsense!)
Message from daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Kyle posts provocative new work in a futile attempt to stop the i nnane riefenstahl nonsense!)