Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thinkofcole@aol.com wrote: > > For Phong: _http://www.photo-seminars.com/Fame/capa.htm_ > (http://www.photo-seminars.com/Fame/capa.htm) > ... which is about how Robert Capa, not Cornell, got his name. I knew about Robert Capa and Gerda, but was curious to why and when Cornell called himself Capa. [By the way, I don't think Gerda and Robert Capa ever married; they might have, had it not been for her death in the battlefield in Spain] > Cornell joined the group in Paris in 1936. This is the information I was looking for, sort of. Is this the time he started calling himself Capa too (or is it II ? :-) ) I just find it odd that Cornell would take on the fictitious name taken by his brother. While Robert and Gerda's choice of name is a stroke of genius and bravado, I cannot quite relate to Cornell's decision. I understand that his family, and particularly their mother had always looked at Andrei as the star in the family, but still So willingly marked himself to be nothing other than Robert's brother. Would you give up your own professional identity if you have an illustrious brother ? (in 1936, Robert Capa was not the celebrity he later became). Or maybe it started out as a joke, and then stuck. Anyway, just a curiosity on a small footnote in photography history. - Phong