Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.
From: mlpowell at sbcglobal.net (Matthew Powell)
Date: Sat Aug 21 17:32:58 2004
References: <c.311ca91a.2e58e1f3@aol.com> <4127914C.7060209@adrenaline.com> <008f01c487b3$97cf56a0$6701a8c0@DAD> <4127AB19.7000507@adrenaline.com>
On Aug 21, 2004, at 3:05 PM, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
> I can imagine an M8d-B/W with a full frame sensor
I don't really keep up with digital product, so maybe this is common
knowledge - are the big companies even working on (affordable)
full-frame SLRs anymore? Seems like they and most users have become
comfortable with smaller sensors.
Alternately, have there been any plans for fast primes for the smaller
sensor? To get something comparable to my $250-300 EOS 50/1.4, you've
got to go to the 35/1.4L at four times the price and quite a bit
larger.
MP
Replies:
Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Another reason to hate Canon.)
Reply from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)
In reply to:
Message from MCyclWritr at aol.com (MCyclWritr@aol.com) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)
Message from jem.kime at ntlworld.com (Jem Kime) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Another reason to hate Canon.)