Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jonathan Borden8/10/04 >The biggest difference is that the inkjet print is definitely 'on the >surface' whereas the Fiber print appears below the surface of the print >-- this is not entirely the glossy/matte issue as, e.g., >Platinum/Palladium prints have that 'depth' appearance. > >I am not sure how much of this will be apparent under glass. How wonderful to hear the considered opinion of a 'print-maker.' These subtle differences in the 'look' and 'feel' of 'prints' really gets to the heart of the matter for me. And whether we can detect these differences under glass certainly is worth considering. I get the most pleasure from looking at prints held in my hands. Turning them this way and that to detect the richness and depth and quality of the printing as well as the paper - including the 'feel' of the paper. Way back when in school I created and printed etchings, engravings, stone lithographs and serigraphs. And worked my way through the the tuition in a commercial photo studio darkroom. Each of these printing techniques offered a unique relationship between the pigments, dyes, silver salts, etc. and their papers. So when we speak of digital capture or film capture we speak as photographers. And when we speak of darkrooms with elon and metol and azo and pryo and digital printing, whether inkjet or lamda or etc. then we begin to speak as print-makers. I love both conversations. Fond regards, G e o r g e L o t t e r m o s e r, imagist? <?>Peace<?> <?>Harmony<?> <?>Stewardship<?> Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways since 1975 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ web <www.imagist.com> eMail george@imagist.com voice 262 241 9375 fax 262 241 9398 Lotter Moser & Associates 10050 N Port Washington Rd - Mequon, WI 53092 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~