[Leica] Dead printer now what works for you

[michael.francis at gs.com (Francis, Michael)]

B.D. 

Thanks for the correction, I hadn't realized that the life time was that
good, as I said I love both the Canon 9900 and the HP7960. I'll have a look
into the warmth, mine seems to be coming out that way, BTW I should say they
still look fantastic. Until I bought these two printers I have had nothing
but pain, this is the first time that I can get on with photography rather
than polishing my computer skills. If HP had a larger printer with the same
configuration I would have bought it rather than the 9900, though there is
very little wrong with the Canon.

Michael

Message: 17
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:47:50 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: bdcolen@earthlink.net
Subject: RE: [Leica] Dead printer now what works for you
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Message-ID:
        
<17834537.1092066471753.JavaMail.root@thecount.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Print life? HP? 110 years for BW on the HP high quality photo papers isn't
good enough for you? ;-) Also, the warmth problem may have to do with
settings; I'm getting really neutral prints.

My only complaints about BW with the 7960 are cost per print - it does eat
carts - and the fact that it can only print up to 8.5 x 11.  Otherwise, it's
a dream. And the prints it turns out look like custom RC prints.

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Francis, Michael" <michael.francis@gs.com>
Sent: Aug 9, 2004 9:55 AM
To: "'lug@leica-users.org'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: RE: [Leica] Dead printer now what works for you


Don, I have both the 7960 and the 9900, both are excellent, B&W on the 7960
tends to look a little warm, on the 9900 you