Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Wed Jul 14 13:48:25 2004
References: <20040714141433.LDEI1749.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@straylight> <1089826065.4790.41.camel@failsafe> <4cfa589b04071413072223f331@mail.gmail.com>
 
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 13:07, Adam Bridge wrote:
> ????? what myth is that? I can't imagine how the two are equated.

For several years there was this myth that because you shot on HD or miniDV
that you didn't need all of the other gear you do when you shoot film, in 
order
to turn out a professional piece of work. You still needs lights, camera 
dollies,
actors etc. and once you rent HD edit bays etc.it can end up costing more 
than
film. It is also a hell of a easier to screw up video, than film.


Feli
In reply to: Message from locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)