Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why a digital M
From: george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue Jul 13 11:12:50 2004
 
robertmeier@usjet.net7/13/04
>So Graphlex's rollfilm adapters weren't as good as a roll fill camera.

Weren't as good for what?
Do you all realize that Linhof, Cambo, Sinar, and others are making brand 
new $3-5K medium format optical bench monorail systems specifically designed 
for 6x9, 6x7, 16 and 22 mpixel backs? And the lenses designed for these new 
state of the art systems cost as much and more than the new 50lux. 

Cambo's selling one of these specifically for the Canon 1ds.

Fond regards,

G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagist?

<?>Peace<?>   <?>Harmony<?>  <?>Stewardship<?>

Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
                                     since 1975
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
web                               <www.imagist.com>
eMail                        george@imagist.com
voice                              262 241 9375 
fax                                262 241 9398 
                      Lotter Moser & Associates
10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In reply to: Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (robertmeier@usjet.net) ([Leica] Why a digital M)