Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fungus now filters
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Fri Jul 2 14:44:12 2004
References: <40E559B5.6060404@summaventures.com> <000001c4602a$0534dd20$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4> <40E559B5.6060404@summaventures.com>
 
The important question is this:   Is the Kodak (and future digital R back)
better off with or without the anti-aliasing filter?

-dan c.

At 02:30 PM 02-07-04 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
>In the Kodak DCS SLR/n and c, the moir? artifacts are visible, just 
>where you expect them to be. Since a bayer pattern is used, you get 
>funny-coloured moir? patterns under some circumstances. The Kodak 
>software does not seem to be able to handle the results as well as an 
>anti-aliasing filter. Whether it makes any difference in real world 
>pictures is another matter.
>
Replies: Reply from george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Fungus now filters)
 In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Fungus now filters)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Fungus now filters)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Fungus now filters)