Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you're discussing the pictures mad by those cameras, you don't need to handle them to form an opinion. Perhaps the ergonomics, glass, or construction will help us make better pictures. I tend to think what I see through the viewfinder is important. But once the images are made, they have to stand on their own. I can see the Noctiblobs even though I've never even seen a noctilux, much less used one. I don't like the blobs. But they wouldn't stop me from using a Noctilux. I'd just try to learn how to avoid them. Proposal: Those of you who are so threatened by the noctiblobs that you feel the need to attack anyone who sees them, should give up the lens and send it to me. It's bad for you. I see the blobs and think I can handle them. Yes that's it. I understand now. As soon as one of you sends me his Noctilux, I promise to become incoherant, claim Bokeh doesn't exist, and start attacking B.D. for describing it. The price of selling one's soul I guess... Mike Quinn On Jun 27, 2004, at 4:30 PM, GREG LORENZO wrote: > And I assume you use same brilliant process (i.e. looking at it > once)in critiquing the R9, R8, R7, R6.2, R6, R5, R4, R3, Sl2, SL and > Leicaflex. If not, perhaps you could enlighten us further?