Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan Post wrote, re. http://www.pixelpress.org/horror_text.html : > The thing that struck me, aside from the stupidity of the guards, was the > part of the article about congress limiting who and what could be > photographed. Not only is this a clear intrusion on the tenth > amendment, but it seems like a start up the 'slippery slope' of abridging > the first amendment. So far, street photographers are banned from taking > shot in and around subways, as I understand, and possibly in other venues > of public transportation. Who is to say that there might not be a ban on > photographing interesting looking people since the attention might be > construed as something sinister- photographing ugly people might hurt their > self esteem, or photographing people eating might cause some mental > trauma in the 'victims'. The US for me, at a very personal level is about freedom. When I first came to the US, nothing epitomized it more than the ability to photograph _anything_ in public view, including military facilities, the Pentagon, etc.. Now I hear of stories of photographers being harassed for taking photos of bridges, subways, etc. I hear of laws and ordinances making such activities suspect and illegal. In the weeks immediately following 9/11, I was travelling by airplane a lot for work. I was very conscious that I was living in a free country, and not once did I feel unsafe. Horrified, and sad, but not unsafe, and above all, free. These days, I feel a little less safe, and a little less free. That to me is victory for the terrorists. - Phong