Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It *will* be interesting to see the aesthetic differences in the fingerprints of the old and new lens. The floating elements design is a significant improvement. I've seen the difference it can make in close-ups (on Olympus Zuiko SLR lenses). It's old technology, but I suspect it was harder to implement on RF lenses. I wonder if bokeh considerations played any part in the design. Since bokeh was really the only major complaint about the Nokton, it would be surprising if Leica didn't consider it. The proof of the pudding will be the pictures. The difference is academic to me. $2500 is out of my price range, especially with some digital decisions looming. But it's interesting nonetheless. So Feli, how about: "Boy am I glad I bought my slightly used 50/1.5 Nokton two years ago! It cost me one-tenth of the price of this new Leica lens, and I'll bet you can barely tell the difference on Tri-X." :-) --Peter, going back to munching his sour grapes :-) Feli wrote: > THIS WEEK: > Good grief, the current Lux is 40 years old! It is soft,overpriced > and useless! I might as well be shooting with a Nikon! I'm buying a > Nocton! > NEXT WEEK: > Good grief, the new Lux is cold, sterile, has ugly ASPH bokeh and lacks > that Leica glow! I'll never sell my old Lux! Never! > ;-)