Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> > Right - and while we're at it, let's ask that Muslim attorney in Oregon > > whose finger prints, the FBI insisted, were on a piece of the Madrid > > bomb about it. ;-) > > > Yea it was all because of that inferior digital output! > :) > and also the poor standards and requirements of finger print evidence in most US jurisdictions. Most other countries (including Spain) need a much higher number of matches than in the US. Even with inferior digital output the Spanish authorities doubted it was a match, something several law enforcement experts across here failed to notice - because the system here generally allows for a much less rigorous comparison. In blind testing within the system I think the last figures I saw where that it's about one in four matches is found to be incorrect. tim PS I used to use a Nikon not a Leica for fingerprint photographs... (back on topic :-) )