Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Again, I just don't get all the whining about scanning and film > types...Tri-X, Fuji Acros, Delta 3200 -throw it in the neg holder and > scan it....period. I used to think so too. But I have just not succeeded in getting equivalents results with 400TX as I was getting with Tri-X 400. My problem is getting flat, flat scans from it. Rich in greys, grey blacks and grey whites. But then I don't feel the same need for Tri-X anymore. If it's light, FP4 is just fine. If it's not light, Neopan 1600 is my choice. Tri-X just doesn't fill a gap anymore so I haven't bothered all that much with it any more. The last couple of weeks are an exception. For some reason I decided to give it a go again. But my conclusion is to take the 40 rolls back and exchange them. It's not worth the effort. Works great in 120 format ... but then I use a different scanner too. That could be it. Who cares. Daniel