Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard F. Man)
Date: Mon May 17 13:56:35 2004
References: <6.0.1.1.2.20040517153854.01bacfb8@pop.runbox.com> <005501c43c50$6bf7aae0$6701a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
It is the cart before the horse unless you don't have a film preference yet 
:-) I am in that situation.

At 01:49 PM 5/17/2004, B. D. Colen wrote:

>Not to start a flame war, but it seems to be this is letting the cart
>decide where the horse should pull it. If one prefers Tri-X to Delta
>400, figure out how best to scan it, don't just switch films because the
>other "scans better." I have to say, and I think have before, that I
>don't get the complaints about scanning tri-x.....

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard@imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
 In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)