Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 5/15/04 8:35 AM, "Thomas Pastorello" <etruscello@yahoo.com> wrote: > Not long ago I was able to sell my Omega D-2 4x5 > enlarger, with Aristo cold light and an Omega dichroic > head (adapted to filter through 6" condensers). In a > nostalgic farewell, I sold three beautiful Rodenstock > Rodagon lenses as well. My Epson Perfection 3200 > flatbed scanner replaces this outfit and does an > exceptional job with my 4x5 negatives for blow-ups to > 13"x19" on the Epson 2000P printer. (And watercolor > paper or archival matte behind glass adequately > replaces my gorgeous Agfa Portriga fiber papers). > Fortunately, I was not able to quickly sell my Omega > C760 enlarger (for formats up to 6x7). I say it is > fortunate I did not sell it because I found such a > wonderful "digital" use for it that I would now never > part with it! > I use the C760 now to digitally "scan" 35mm slides > and negatives and get beautiful results that rival the > quality of the output of my Canoscan 4000 but with far > greater speed! I remove the dichroic head from the > enlarger and place it upside down on the baseboard. > In place of the head, I mount my Nikon D100 with > Nikkor 60mm f2.8 1:1 Micro lens. (Omega sells a > camera mount to allow the conversion of the enlarger > into a copy stand.) For slides, I set the dichroic > head for white, the D100 for tungsten light, and the > lens for 1:1 and very quickly convert slides into high > resolution, sharp and well color-balanced digital > images. For negatives, I get the same exceptional > results after setting the filtration of the dichroic > head to compensate for the orange mask of the > negatives. Of course the digital files for the > negatives are in color inverted form, but that is > quickly corrected in Photoshop with one menu click. > (Just one other note about Photoshop: I find that if > I set the D100 to sharp, I should not use any > sharpening in Photoshop or else the film grain becomes > too apparent in large blow-ups.)(Just one other note > about the D100: I set it to monitor highlight > overexposure -- this works wonders for contrast > control.) > So yes, in some sense I still use a darkroom but my > transition to digital is now complete. The work I do > with the C760 is no longer in the dark. I enjoy the > speed and quality of the new process; but of my old > routine, I miss the comfort of its womb-like > atmosphere, the sound of my metronome against the > backdrop of soft classical music, the sight of > tray-bound images slowly emerging to life in the warm > orange glow of the darkroom... > Tom > > > No offence Tom but this kind of stuff, positive as I am about digital I find crushingly disheartening. It takes out my will to live. Although I hate to overstate things. I hope your D2 has gone on to a better afterlife with a new master. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon New-improved http://rabinergroup.com/