Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 Peter Klein thoughtfully wrote: > >How all this plays out is going to be very interesting. I'd hate to be >prohibited from dust spotting my photos lest I corrupt the "truth checksum" >embedded in my TIFF file by my camera or scanner. And what of gray areas >like the environmental portrait that appears in a newspaper or news >magazine. Many times these are staged in order to characterize the >subject. Unless the staging is obvious, it has much of the power of a >journalistic photo, yet its honesty depends on the honesty of the photographer. > I suspect that one thing that a journalist should maintain is an unaltered image from the camera - preferably in RAW format. I don't know if there are tools that allow one to go from TIFF back to RAW. Probably someone could write one. But even with that tool a RAW file would be a reasonable indication of the nature of the image ultimately represented. Those two, in juxtaposition, should reveal image modification. Adam