Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 2:30 PM -0400 5/12/04, Tina Manley wrote:
>At 09:25 AM 5/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Well said Henning.
>>I am staunchly on your side and Philippe's,
>>and opposite of B.D., Mark, and others'.
>>To say that the image in itself looses its power
>>because it is staged, (which it is not) is like
>>saying a story is not good because it is fiction.
>>Do you guys only watch movies "based on a true
>>story" ?
>
>But, Phong, to write fiction and pass it off as true would be just
>as wrong as staging a documentary photograph. That's how several
>journalists have gotten in trouble lately. There should be a
>definite line between truth and fiction in writing just as there
>should be between staged and documentary photographs.
>
>Tina
I fully agree. I don't necessarily care whether a photo is staged or
not (depends on circumstances, as does almost everything) but I want
to be informed whether it was or not.
In the case of the Capa photo, it would in my opinion be just as
powerful, but in a somewhat different way, had it been staged.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com