Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 5/9/04 4:56 PM, "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote: > Sorry, I disagree a little. Sure the child might be blurry because of the > motion. However, the background is shaky as well, leading me to believe > that the camera was shaking. May be an attempt to pan and catch the motion? > I think it will work better if it is not so. Just my $0.02. > > At 04:47 PM 5/9/2004, Oliver wrote: > >> Ron showed: >> >> http://curiousrobot.com/Extras/worksornot.html >> >> I think it's a perfectly delightful catch. Of course it's blurry - the kid >> and its world are in motion! Many famous photographs convey a sense of >> excitement in this manner. > It has the blurriness of a Great picture. Without some blur she is not even going down the slide but could have stopped herself. Belongs in a John Szarkowski book. (Looking At Photographs) I love this shot. ... And I hate kid shots. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon New-improved http://rabinergroup.com/