Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Like many people on this list, I own a lot of different equipment. Some melted plastic 8fps auto Japanese, some do it all yourself larger format, and Leicas, lots of Leicas. The point is to use what makes the image you want to make using the best tool. Serious wildlife photography these days is digital because you can shoot 10,000 frames of that beast to get just the correct light, eye shine, expression, and juxtaposition with no added cost. Think about schlepping ten miles up hill on broken terrain to get the location nailed and lose the shot because the camera was rewinding or the light changed a lot and you needed 400 ISO and you had 100. Large capacity cards and a digital wallet and you can shoot and shoot and shoot. But I don't often take those kinds of images; mostly now, I take pictures of friends and the greater community to show as a PAW. For that, an M is what works for me. After three decades I don't really need to look at the camera to zone focus, guess an exposure on negative film, point the camera and shoot. For me, the M, any M is an extension of my hand and eye. Last, I am really comfortable with film. Properly washed, sleeved, and stored the B&W negatives will be available for a really long time and may someday end up at some college like Sonny works at. Images of normal life showing how people lived, where they lived, and the stuff they accumulated. Real information captured for social historians to ponder. In a hundred years, it will not be the famous that matters; it will be the little everyday things that will be of interest. Your photo album and your mother in laws pictures will be what interest the future. Will I go digital? Probably, especially if a digital M becomes a reality. I keep trying to like either little pocket digitals or the DSLR's. The small cameras just get in the way too much, and I just don't care to spend large dollars changing a system: my telephoto's would work fine but I really do use 15-24 a pretty fair amount of time and that requires money to replicate what already works. Besides, the really wides for the current DSLR's are pretty awful, don't flame me, I have the digital files with really god-awful edges and corners. B.D., the Olympus may be pretty good, but I am not going to buy into a new system at this point. YMMV and thanks for reading the rant. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com