Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 27, Issue 151
From: langhans at compwrx.com (langhans)
Date: Sun May 2 18:46:29 2004
References: <200405021947.i42JhSi3021312@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Julian.

No I haven't.  Part of the problem is also that a slight diopter adjustment
would really help, and the R8 does give me that option built in.  Maybe I
should look around for a good deal on an R6 screen.  It works just fine and
I usually get very good shots with it, though it takes more time focusing
than my R8, especially with the macro work that I like.

Aram

> Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 10:07:30 -0400
> From: "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] why is the R4 so cheap?
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <004101c4304e$d22774c0$308e5741@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Aram,
>
> Have you tried replacing the original "R4" viewfinder screen with the more
> recent "R" screen?  I read that it is significantly brighter than the
> original.  I did the replacement and find the brightness adequate.  Of
> course, there's a lot subjective here, since I am unable to do an
effective
> A-B comparison.  My R4 has done perfect service under light use for the
past
> 19 years, without so much as a CLA.   I also have an R8 and an SL.
>
> As you, I have also concluded that it is worth much more to me as a backup
> camera than it is on the resale market.
>
> Regards............Julian


Replies: Reply from jkoplen at mindspring.com (Julian Koplen) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 27, Issue 151)