Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:57 AM 4/29/2004 -0700, you wrote: >I checked the specs on the Coolscan V alongside the 5000. Is their >difference in dmax, at 4.2 and 4.8 respectively, that noticeable? The scan >time of the V, since I'm not a production house, isn't a draw back for me, >but the almost $500 difference is. >Any thoughts??? >S. Dimitrov Slobodan - I'm not sure about the differences in the V and the 5000, but the differences in the IV and 4000 are that the IV scans at 14 dpi vs 16 dpi for the 5000, 2900dpi vs 4000 dpi, and there are no multiple-sample scans for the IV. If the differences are similar, I'd say it's worth it to get the bigger, better scanner. You don't want to scan everything and just have to rescan it later. The multiple-scan option is worth it for negatives or slides with dense shadows. However, if the V gives you all of that, go for it. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com