Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. Colen wrote: > > First off, Phong, what lab? If you drop the film > at most labs there will invariably be some > scratches, and there will be dust to deal with > afterwards. Additionally, there will be color > correction issues with film. B.D., If I have to do my own processing, I would prefer digital also. I use A&I for film development and proofs. They are a bit expensive, but the client pays for that. A retired printer is doing the final prints for me. She used to have a commercial lab, but did not want to convert to digital. I am also testing out a new lab in Montreal. I just don't spend the 40-60 hours that Jim mentioned. With film, I would only do the color correction for the final prints (actually, I specify the needed color corrections to the printer; I don't do my own printing for wedding work). All the labs I know, both local and remote, expect me to send them color corrected files, working with profiles they supply, unless I am willing to pay them a lot of money. A couple of minutes per photo add up to about 6-10 hours. Contrary to my expectation, scratches and especially dust has not been a problem at all for me with new negatives. I understand that you have the luxury of not working with proofs (you only deliver the final product). If I could do that, I may prefer digital also. If I were shooting with B&W only, I may also prefer digital. I love digital for the instant feedback, and am working very hard to switch over. But digital has not won me over 100% yet. And believe me, I tried very hard, and shot digital almost exclusively for 2 years. And I continue to try to improve my digital skills. For example, I plan to attend the Cone Editions Digital Workflow Workshop this summer http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/ws/workshop-cdw.html and see what I can learn there to improve my digital workflow. Anyway, right now, I am comfortable with both processes, so I let the clients decide. They also decide between color and B&W. For both 35mm and digital, I shoot Canon EOS, so use the same lenses, flash, battery pack, etc. It's really all the same to me. The client likes digital, I shoot digital. The client likes film, I shoot film. No difference in price. > Digital wedding shooting is a gift from the photo gods. I am not sure if this feeling is universal. It is for me, as it allows me to shoot low-end (say less than $1200) weddings. In that range, it's hard to make much of a profit if I have to pay $200 for film and processing, just to throw some numbers out. > Give me a call if you want to talk about it. No, I rather settle this in person. :-) Actually, I hope to see you in person some time this summer. Perhaps we'll do another Boston LUG thingy. Too busy at the moment though. Cheers, - Phong