Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: M3 1/2
From: dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter)
Date: Sat Apr 3 20:19:26 2004
References: <000a01c41944$ab44cd60$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <406E59CF.9070006@aol.com> <20040403125905.GB15542@panix.com> <20040403141146.GA450@panix.com> <406F810E.477C8D93@hale-pohaku.com> <406F83C4.D9A2B63D@pacbell.net>
Got it! Yes it would/should be an M3R
but then I would wonder what that is!
Jerry Lehrer wrote:
> Dennis
>
> Rei told us about this a long time ago. It is an M3 with an M4 type
> takeup "tulip" and bottom plate. I would call it the M3 equivalent
> of the M2R.
>
> Come to think of it, shouldn't Rei call it an M3R? DAG did the
> job for him.
>
> Jerry
Replies:
Reply from luc at forcemajeure.qc.ca (Luc Bourgeois) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)
In reply to:
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from gwpics at aol.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] What would you do if this happened to you?)
Message from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)
Message from jerryleh at pacbell.net (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Re: M3 1/2)