Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As a former reporter for The New York Times, I can assure you that the fastest way to get action on the damages you sustained in that airport inspection is to get some major newspaper or camera magazine to write a story about it. I suggest you contact [by mail or Email] The New York Times, The Washington Post , The Wall Street Journal, maybe Shutterbug, and also tell Leica itself. I am certain that Leica has its own way of getting attention to such complaints through its worldwide pr staff. To get this attention, I would draft a letter to one or more papers carefully stating --without venom-- exactly what you carried, how you were treated, the condition of your equipment when you got it back and what, if anything, the responsible people said or did when you told them that your equipment had been damaged. Give each of those you contant your name, address and phone number and invite them to phone you for any questions they might have. Be as brief as possible, maybe keeping the whole thing on one page and, if possible, follow up your letter by phone to each of those you wrote to. If you're lucky, someone will see merit in your letter and you will get a call. You may not get immediate action but once a major newspaper prints this kind of heavy-handed result -- even though we definitely must have a safe airline service -- you may be surprised to find how receptive everybody involved suddenly has become. After all, if serious photographers -- amateur and professional -- are frightened to take cameras on planes, the financial loss to all sorts of people and places, like camera stores, film makers and processors, travel destinations, restaurants, airlines, etc., would be huge. Best of luck -- bob cole