Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The SL2 is every bit as robust as the SL It's essentially the same camera with a reshaped rear and an added pointer for aperture. 99.5% of the parts are interchangeable. The only thing that might create an illusion of less robustness is that the SL@ has about 1cc more air in it because of the straighter rear corners. This will change the sound that's made when you tap an sl2 from the rear 3/4 vs an sl. There is no difference in robustness! Javier >When the SL2 came out it wasn't the robust hammer the >hell out of it >same >camera. I believe it was the beginning of the electronic bits and >pieces so >they were a tad frail, bump one and the meter would >go haywire. The SL? >You >could hammer nails building an arctic bivouac and it >would still work __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html