Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:08:44 +0100
References: <034b01c3ccec$43485d70$6501a8c0@len> <002501c3ccfb$11ece020$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <004e01c3cd67$42394180$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <001c01c3d151$c2288f20$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net>

> Hi Simon,
> I always look for a highlight in the eyes, on the glasses or whatever
> highlight on the face I can see. In some cases it's nothing more than a
> faint highlight along a cheek and that becomes the focus point.  Of course
> it still comes down to practice and working in available light and not so
> available light situations.
> True, but in reality all the reading and theories on the "greatness of
> whatever lens" isn't going to make the picture any better, if the
> photographer doesn't have the guts to shoot wide open in the first place.
We
> see it often said ....."I like to stop down to f4-5.6 or 8!" Big deal! So
> much for the theories of the lens having great character in available
light,
> anti-flair effect etc. wide open!
> I don't have any problem with anyone reading the techie stuff as we have
> people on Leica lists who are more interested in how many twinkies per mm
> than the actual use of the lens to take / make pictures.
>
> I suppose my problem is, I love shooting pictures of almost any subject
> "other than weddings" ;-) And have always done so with little or no
> understanding of the technical aspect of the lens, as my prime interest
has
> always been...." how fast is it?" That's always been the criteria and will
> be for buying, more than the contrast one lens to another.
>
> As usual I acknowledge and appreciate what I've learned on the screen of
> technical aspects in Leica lenses and found it interesting, but its never
> influenced me to buy one lens over another if it isn't faster than what
I'm
> using.
>
> ted
>
Few days ago I posted some low light practise.in case you missed it:
> http://www.leica-gallery.net/apekop/folder-6030.html
I,ll keep on trying
simon
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
In reply to: Message from "Leonard J Kapner" <ljkapner@cox.net> (RE: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)