Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Who became famous upon assignment to photograph the Queen, turned his back to the Queen and photographed the crowd? Maybe if you are hired by the Bride to photograph the wedding you should have her in focus at all times. Otherwise I think these photographs say something about the wedding but I wouldn't call them "happysnap"s. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "JCB" <jcb@visualimpressions.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Not a PAW... > At 08:18 AM 12/30/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > >Hi Eric, > >Sorry to disagree with you, but I think it's an "almost perfect swishy pan" > >as I call this type of picture illustrating motion which I try when shooting > >some sports to capture the action. > > > In a wedding, the MOST IMPORTANT person, place, or thing, IS THE BRIDE. > > I believe that ALL photographs in which the bride is dominant, the bride's > head must be the "focus" of attention. Swishiness is good for the > background, groom, brides dress, etc, but the pan should have the brides > upper torso and head, or just her head, be the most in focus part of the > big swish. > > If you miss this, then the shot is just a happysnap. > > The photo in question has the brides left hand, purse, midriff, and > mid-trailing head dress in focus. This is the wrong stuff. Therefore, this > is at best, a . > > JB > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html