Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Inspired but arrested
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 06:25:45 +0100 (MET)
References: <3.0.2.32.20031221222545.00f6b374@pop.infionline.net> <3.0.2.32.20031222140948.00d6eb38@pop.infionline.net>
 
> Seriously, reread the US Constitution and tell me WHERE environmental
> protection is an item of interest for the Federal government.

Doesn't the constitution in some way take into account the safety of
individuals? Environmental protection is not there just to muck around
with certain groups of society, but to protect individuals and their
health on the whole. I don't think it sounds so strange that a basic human
right should be handled by the authority with the widest coverage.

Daniel
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] Inspired but arrested)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] Inspired but arrested)