Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:48:59 -0800
References: <AF6013BA-2FEF-11D8-AE3B-0003938C439E@btinternet.com>

><Snip> 
> > wasted image and less wasted expensive silicon. I'm glad to see that
> > Leica
> > seems to be thinking along the same lines with the D2.
> >
> > --howard
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2
> >
> >
> >> I cant see how you'd assume it has the same proportion as the 35mm
> >> film
> > frame.
> >> I'd assume it would be more square than that. 2 over 3.
> >> I'd assume 3 over 4 which is the shape of an 8x10 sheet of paper.
> >> This would make more efficient use of the image circle.
> >>
> >> Mark Rabiner
><Snip> 

I guessed or remembered right it is 3 over 4 but that's not 8x10 of
course which is 4 over 5!

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux 2)