Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There's big and then there's BIG and MASSIVE. Mt. Rainer is BIG and MASSIVE as it towers over the surrounding mountains. http://www.peakbagger.com/peak/rainier.htm > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:21:26 -0700 > From: "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> > Subject: RE: [Leica] It's snowing! It's snowing! > Message-ID: <200312091421.hB9ELZG18728@perch.serverhost.net> > References: > > I stand corrected, Doug. Mt. Whitney is 14494. Colorado comes in second, > with Mt. Elbert, at 14433. I meant that we had more higher mountains. We > have 54 over 14,000 feet. California has "only" 15. (See me trying to save > face? !!!) ;-) > Kit > - -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Doug Herr > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:04 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] It's snowing! It's snowing! > > I seem to recall that Mt. Whitney in CA is the tallest in the lower 48. > Y'all in the rockies sure have lots of the big ones, more than we on the > left coast do. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html