Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:13:32 -0600
References: <000b01c3bf69$1bc5b940$6501a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <015101c3bf6c$0ee83ce0$3d620b44@pc>
>I have no comment on that particular show, only that the fine line between
>art and porn(if there is one) is a valid area to work in.
Did you actually check out the photos? There's no nudity involved so
I'm having difficulty seeing where you see porn. From a pure visual
perspective, they're a rip on the milk moustache advertisements.
KN
- --
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Aaron Sandler <aaron.sandler@duke.edu> (Re: [Leica] Mixed Company (was: The fine line between art and pornography))
Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
In reply to:
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Message from "www.geocities.com/curtisbliss" <surrealistic@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)