Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers
From: "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:01:22 -0700

So much for sweeping generalizations! ;-)

Kit

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
Teresa299@aol.com
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:13 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] #$@%$^ art photographers


In a message dated 12/8/03 7:20:55 AM, KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu writes:

<< sally mann and anna
gaskill and any other number of very talented people.  >>

anna, gaskill tilts her camera and shoots from below.  She has strange ideas

about Alice in Wonderland and therefore she's not displaying reality and 
therefore, sucks.

Sally Mann shoots subjects that make people feel uncomfortable.  Therefore 
she sucks.

Anything that is not direct or closely related to photojournalism is art 
photography and therefore must suck.

The best photography is scientific photography.  My person favourites are 
photographs of microscopic viruses.   Those don't suck.  Unless they are in
black 
and white.  Black and white isn't as close to reality and therefore sucks 
more than color.


Kim
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html