Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan Wajsman said Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 48: A stroll around Seville > Hi Ted, > > Thanks for your comments, I always appreciate the time you take and of course > and praise from you is really a compliment! Now to some of the specifics:<<< > > First, a side street to Calle Betis in the old part of Seville, called > > > Triana: > http://www.wajsmanphoto.com/2003_48.jpg ted said: > > The balance in this picture is quite interesting as most elements are in odd > > numbers whichever direction the eye goes. But for me one very interesting > > point is........ the camera is held straight!!! ;-) In this situation with > > so many verticals it would be a shame not to have the camera as close to > > perfect as possible, even hand held. Any tilting the slightest bit and the > > feel of the picture would screw-up. Nathan responded: > CONFESSION: this is a picture where I really took the time to think about the > composition, and I knew that it had to be absolutely straight-on. In the end I > succeeded in holding it straight vertically, although there is a slight sideways > tilt in the original slide. I corrected it with a 1-degree "rotate canvas" in > Photoshop--this is kosher for me, as it corresponds exactly to moving the easel > around on the enlarger base in the good old days of wet printing.<<< ted saaid: I never have any problem with this kind of PS correction, quite normal actually. And anyone thinking other wise is a fool and never had much time in a wet darkroom. ted said: > > The person walking in against > > the sign direction was the "lucky factor" ;-) we all need. :-) Nathan responded: > This is the kind of "luck" you plan for and wait for...<<< ted said: Spoken like a true Cartier-Bresson! ;-) But the most important thing is, to "see the situation first" and appreciate the potential. Which you did very well. > > > A lady cleans her balcony on Calle Niebla, along which I walk in the > > > morning on the way to my office: > > > http://www.wajsmanphoto.com/2003_48alt1.jpg ted said: > > The unfortunate element here is it's "a little bulls eye" with the sweeper > > almost dead centre. But shooting people, one doesn't have the luxury of > > "non moving peeling paint" and the photographer usually gut reacts to the > > scene and shoots by instinct. It's still has a nice feel. Nathan responded: > CONFESSION 2: You are right, she is too centered. This is a cropped image. In > the original, she is better placed, off-center, but when I looked at the scan, I > decided to crop it because there was too much junk along the sides.<<< ted said: Ok we all do thngs like that and I bet a few weeks from now you'll look at the original and leave it as is. ;-) And actually feel good about it without the cropping.;-) > > > A side wall of a church in the neighbourhood called La Macarena: > > > http://www.wajsmanphoto.com/2003_48alt3.jpg ted said: > > Bingo!!! You win the prize on this....almost. :-( However.... yeah here > > comes the nit-picking! ;-) > > > > And I bet you know exactly what it is considering the million dollar > > potential of this situation, "If only a split second " and the lady wasn't > > looking at you would be 100% perfect. And even if she's not looking directly > > at you it appears she is and that turn of the head takes the perfect edge > > off a perfect photograph. Like it's only 99.9999% perfect. > > > > It maybe nit picking on my part but that's life in the hard and fast lane of > > photography. It's still a damn fine picture though! :-) And a very good eye > > to see and re-act immediately. Nathan responded: > Fast lane indeed. Whereas with the main picture I had to wait for quite a while > for a passer-by, in this spot there were many people walking by, and I wanted an > isolated person or family. The light was fading fast, so this was the best that > I could get in the circumstances. ted said: Sometimes we have to go with what's the best for the moment certainly when things, "light, time etc" are a controlling factor in waiting and winning or losing altogether. In this location there's so much potential for a "great photograph" I'd return and work it for all its worth. You know where the location is and approximate time of first picture so it makes it a piece of cake to return and ......... wait for a few more shots with varying people situations!...... It's too good a location not to work it to death. So on that note the LUG crew await your ..... "A side wall of a church 2, the sequel!" ;-) ted - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html