Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for finding the article, as I've been wondering what had happened to them. Considering how many groups' causes DoubleTake championed, you'd think that some would of come out with a monetary helping hand. Slobodan Dimitrov - ---------- >From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] The Decisive Moment is gone >Date: Thu, Oct 30, 2003, 5:17 PM > > At 04:39 PM 10/30/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>I think that at one time it was considered advocacy photography, which has >>once again come back full circle to that definition. Recently, publications >>like Doubletake and Aperture have added a sort of formalism to the approach. >>The demands of a new photographic consumer, the investor, pushed for new >>definitions of the work on hand. Definitions that I think would often be at >>odds with past usages that the photographer's used themselves. >>Slobodan Dimitrov > > Speaking of Doubletake, it has finally bitten the dust: > > http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2003/10/29/money_problems_s helve_dou > bletake/ > > In spite of Bruce Springsteen's $1,000,000 contribution. > > Tina > > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html