Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My point was that a wolf is a wolf and a dog is a dog, but they are very different from one another. But I suppose a given hybrid may have more dog characteristics than wolf, or vice versa. By the way, did you hear about the insomniac, atheist dyslexic who would lie awake at night wondering if there was a dog? - -dan c. At 04:54 PM 26-10-03 -0800, Jerry Lehrer wrote: >Dan > >On second thought, I never thought that I was getting a dog, I thought >I was buying a hybrid. (Back then, they were called that). So maybe >I wasn't a fool by your definition. > >I wish I could have another, but my infirmity precludes me from >running etc. with a big dog > >BTW, he got along with our four cats. Two of them would try to >snuggle next to him as he slept. > >Jerry > >Dan C wrote: > >> Regardless of the latin name zoologists decide to give wolves and dogs, >> they are not the same animal. Anyone buying a wolf (or wolf/dog hybrid) >> cub thinking they are getting a dog is a fool. >> >> -dan c. >> >> At 03:46 PM 26-10-03 -0800, Jerry Lehrer wrote: >> > >> >I recently found out that he could not be properly called a "hybrid", as >> >wolves and dogs are the same species. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html