Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: Re[4]: [Leica] Chris Williams, did you see this Panasonic?
From: "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:33:29 -0500

Sonny,

Great link.....Thanks.

Sam Krneta

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-
> users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Sonny Carter
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: Afterswift@aol.com
> Subject: Re[4]: [Leica] Chris Williams, did you see this Panasonic?
> 
> Hello Afterswift,
> 
> Saturday, October 4, 2003, 10:48:32 PM, you wrote:
> 
> Aac> I was talking about the body design, which is still digital in
form,
> as is my
> Aac> nifty 5050, and the newer 5060. I prefer the classic film body
and
> its
> Aac> simplicity. OK, I'm conservative in camera preferences. I just
hope
> it will be
> Aac> applied to digitals.
> 
> Aac> Bob
> 
>   Er, I have maybe 35 cameras, dating from the late 1800's to 2002.
>   The film bodies are all over the place in style. I really don't have
>   an idea what you mean by classic film body and its simplicity.  Have
>   you ever seen a  Kodak 35 Rangefinder?  No simplicity there.
>   http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/kodak_35.html
> 
>   How about folders, twin lens reflexes?   That Panasonic looks more
>   like a 1990's film SLR than many film cameras today.
> 
>   S.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: Re[4]: [Leica] Chris Williams, did you see this Panasonic?)