Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras FS New Store -- Speaking of Nikons
From: Allen Graves <ahgraves@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:16:21 -0500
References: <138.25828e0d.2ca50fa7@aol.com> <3F740C3B.84455CF9@rabinergroup.com>

I had the shutter replaced on my 1977 FM (also Lika Leica, to keep it 
on topic) a couple of years ago and was told that it was one of the 
last new FM shutters available from Nikon. They said that they would 
all be gone in a few months from that time. At least, for now, Leica 
seems to be keeping the parts in stock a little longer.

Allen


>Afterswift@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>  In a message dated 9/25/03 6:28:11 PM, kenf@speakeasy.net writes:
>>
>>  << So you paid $77 for a perfect Nikon F? Pretty damn unusual. >>
>>
>>  Maybe my arithmetic may be off. I think I paid about $300+ for the Nikon F
>>  new with a standard pentaprism and f2 50mm lens, which I had 
>>converted by Nikon
>>  to AE for $30 when they offered that deal. The store in question 
>>was charging
>>  $600 for the pentaprism and $800 for the pentaprism and lens 
>>combined. I don't
>>  know what they wanted for an F body. But it seems the F is constantly rising
>>  in the market. Ever try to sell a used Olympus 4040 digital after 
>>the Oly 5050
>>  came out? Want a real bargain in a new Nikon? Take a look at the 
>>latest Nikon
>>  FM family. I recall this baby will provide a full range of 
>>mechanical as well
>>  as electronic shutter speeds. I have no idea how Nikon did that. Leica Solms
>>  should have done it in the M7. I think the M7 furnishes two 
>>mechanical speeds.
>>
>>  br
>
>I still have my FM from '77 when it first came out and it's just like a
>Leica. (nod nod wink wink)
>It has a battery which runs the meter. That's it. The similarities go on
>and to be eerie it also only goes to 1000th of a second. Also it used
>LED's to center the meter with just like an M6 vanilla classic or close.
>It does sync at 125th though instead of our 50th so you can go outside
>with a small flash and shoot something more than 5 feet away.
>
>The FE came out the next year with an automatic setting and silicon
>cells - same sync. I didnt like the looks of it. I like the M7 though!
>Wrong millennium!
>The FM2 didn't come out until '82 and the FE2 '83.
>These had a stop faster synced titanium shutters and faster shutter
>speeds by a couple of stops! The shutters were changed to good old
>aluminum at the very end of the decade. I shot my FM2 in the studio at
>the mechanical 250th of a second sync speed not draining batteries. Lots
>of film went through those camreas with those cheap MD 11 and 12 moter drives.
>
>The Titan FM2 was mainly made of aluminum but had titanium top plate,
>upper cover, bottom plate, rear cover. No empty Krylon titanium spray
>paint cans were evident.
>
>The High tech FA came out in 83 with microprocessor and a year before
>the Mac and the M6 and the Death of Ansel. When did that Canon A1 come out?
>The FG was an EM not made for the mass market and with better bells 
>and whistles.
>I recall the FM ad campain used womens hands as if it were designed as a
>"womens camera" or for people with small hands. Every photogapher I knew
>had at least one. Few had small hands. Few were women. One was a women
>with big hands. I think they owed thier existence not to a new womens or
>small handed market but to the sudden existence of the revolutionary Oly
>OM1 which made everyone realize it didnt take a camera the size of a
>typewriter to expose a 24x36mm chip of film. And "it's the water".
>
>ANd that they could be more Like a Lieca. SLR Leica's.
>And a lot lite-a and cheep a.
>We tried to be HCB with them but our wide angles got in the way-  24's
>or 28's most of us. A 35 was considered a tele to this group of people
>here in 70's Portland.
>As we know on the LUG HCB used 50's.
>And Rangefinders.
>I'd never sell my FM's so what its worth does not interest me that much.
>I replaced the shutter at least once for more money then I could buy a
>whole camera used I'm sure. But it wouldnt be MY camera. It was worth
>it. The bulk of my body of work was shot with Fm's. I found Leica in
>1990 and lost interst in the FM wavelenth.
>Now listening to the groovy LM electro-magnetic spectrum.
>LSMFT.
>Lucky strike means fine tobac-a.
>
>Mark Rabiner
>
>Portland, Oregon USA
>http://www.rabinergroup.com
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Afterswift@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Cameras FS New Store -- Speaking of Nikons)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Cameras FS New Store -- Speaking of Nikons)