Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 90 macro eye attachment
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:42:05 -0700
References: <p05100303bb95710f913a@[10.0.1.4]> <000201c38173$f8100f10$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4> <p05100303bb95710f913a@[10.0.1.4]>

At 09:09 PM 9/22/2003 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
>>No need to get the new 90 if the size is no inducement, or if you carry a 
>>90 Summicron anyways. I'm sure the 90AA would perform adequately at f/4 
>>and smaller at closer distances.
>
>Actually, if the distance between the front and rear nodal points on the 
>lenses are different, there will be some difference and your focossing 
>point might be different.
>....

Wellllll, in the case that IF it works with other 90, such as the 90AA, I 
may actually be interested in the eyes. I was carrying an M7 w/ 35 and an 
OM-4T w/ 90 Macro on couple trips and one of the reasons was the macro 
focusing.


// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 90 macro eye attachment)
In reply to: Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 90 macro eye attachment)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> ([Leica] 90 macro eye attachment)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 90 macro eye attachment)