Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:59:42 -0700
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030913170845.037e2980@192.168.100.11>

At 05:42 PM 9/13/2003 -0700, Ted Grant wrote:
>Richard F. Man wondered:
>
> > Yes, one of the perpetual comparison question. Which one is "best" wide
> > open at 1.4, and how soft is the Canon at 1.2?
> >
> > Looks like there's a Nikkor 1.4 and a Canon 1.2 for sale right now, I am
> > somewhat tempted....
>
>Aw gee whiz Richard, save yer dollars, go Noctilux and get the best! ;-)
>
>Then you have eliminated the quandary of which is best between two lesser
>lenses! ;-)
>
>Now I've said that I'll assume there'll be incoming for a bit! ;-)
>...

If I can get a Nocti' for around $1300. I would!!! Is yours for sale now 
that you are (gasp) thinking about going digital?


// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
In reply to: Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> ([Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)