Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Christopher Williams wrote: > > Third M body useful? Hella yes! M6, M2, M3 > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rei Shinozuka" Subject: Re: [Leica] A second M body? > > > i think a second M body is mandatory. the question is: is a third M > > body & lens useful? I think: yes!! > > > > -rei > > -- And every body you've got makes you more secure enough to actually USE YOUR CAMERAS. I MEAN it people just don't. They are afraid it will break or blemish. "Why have more than one body?" Often the same people who do stuff I'm not up on which is the trading thing. Whole camera systems or just cameras. "WHERE'S THE PRINTS?" OR results in other forms. "Where's your TRAY?". (Cameras are for Every Body) (you were waiting for that) Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html